NEA Is About Power, Not The Children

Looks Like They're not "for the children" after all. (HT Ysletateachers.org)



Let's cut to the chase. Check out the comments made from the NEA’s annual meeting in July, 2009:

CHANIN: “Despite what some among us would like to believe it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.”

“And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year, because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them, the unions that can protect their rights and advance their interests as education employees.”

“This is not to say that the concern of NEA and its affiliates with closing achievement gaps, reducing dropout rates, improving teacher quality and the like are unimportant or inappropriate. To the contrary. These are the goals that guide the work we do. But they need not and must not be achieved at the expense of due process, employee rights and collective bargaining. That simply is too high a price to pay.”

So in other words, collective bargaining rights come first, and the children are on the back burner, if they're on the stove at all.

Here's the question I propose: What's the primary purpose of schools, to educate kids, or to provide jobs, benefits,and pensions for union workers? According to Bob Chanin, it's the latter. The taxpayers that pay his salary hwo want to reign in the unions believe it's the former. Given how schools for the most part have underperformed, with scandals involving some of the folks who run them, shouldn't somebody be protesting that??

Background Reading:

Fox News: Teachers Union Big Wig Says It's Not About Kids, It's About Power!