Monday, January 17, 2011

The Big Shock: Update: Certain Teacher Unions Say Pensions Don't Payout Enough

They sure have the nerve. (HT IFT)



Upon futher review (always wanted to say that!) adjustments had to be made. See comments section for details.

Teacher unions insatiable appetite for cash continues unchecked. This time it's in the form of the Illinois Federation of Teachers. From ChampionNews.net:

"One of the top legislative priorities of the (Illinois Federation of Teachers)is a plan they call "80, 30 and out." It would allow teachers to retire after 30 years with a pension equal to 80% of their salary. This is in contrast to the current plan of 35 years at 75% of salary.

If implemented the "80, 30 and out" plan would mean a teacher (or administrator) could retire at age 51 with full pension equal to 80% of the average of his last four years salaries.

Here's the quote from the IFT-AFT website:

* An increase in the ceiling from 75% to 80% of earnings for all retirement systems
* A "30 years and out" with no penalty retirement option for all systems

Even the Teachers Retirement System, a state agency under the Department of Insurance, supports retirement at age 55 with 30 years. This should come as no surprise since 6 of the 13 members of the Board of Trustees is required to be a teacher or former teacher. Democratic governors appointed the other seven members of the board after receiving millions of dollars in political contributions from the teacher unions. Blagojevich alone received over $1.7 million from the teachers including checks for $300,000, $300,000, $250,000, $225,000 and $200,000.

Unions are out of touch but not out of money.

The teacher unions in Illinois have more money available to spend than any other Illinois political group. They have contributed over $45 million to Illinois politicians since electronic records began in the 1990's. To see which politicians got how much see "Golden Handcuffs..." Their 160,000 members keep sending in their dues every payday (they are deducted automatically and submitted to the local union by the school districts.) Since we know teachers' salaries go up every year by 7%, the union dues keep stacking up in the union's bank account. The (IFT) itself had revenue of more than $47 million in 2009.

The teacher unions are inherently political organizations because only by political means can they increase transfers of wealth from the private sector taxpayers to their members. Increases in teacher salaries, benefits and pensions come about by the political assignment of an ever-increasing percentage of available tax revenues to the benefit of the teachers at the expense of less powerful political groups such as the poor and the elderly. How can the poor and the elderly compete with the teacher union's $45 million in political contributions?

That is how teachers at Avoca District 37 can sign a contract for 35% salary increases (minimum) over the next five years with political approval while politicians, at the same time, cut $90 million from the Department of Human Services, money originally earmarked for the handicapped, mentally ill and poor seniors. This is how $45 million in political contributions begets $100,000 salaries for 9-month part-time public employees. Too bad the poor don't contribute more maybe then they would get increases too."

Here's how Illinois citizens can beat back this greed:

"First, instead of increasing pensions the governor should revert the pensions back to where they were when they were "guaranteed" by the state constitution in 1980. That would be 60% at age 60 growing to a maximum of 70% at age 66.

Second, he should also insist on a sharing of risk between employees and employer. If the pension funds do not earn a rate of return assumed by the trustees then the cost should be split 50/50. Currently the entire investment risk lies with the taxpayers.

Third, the maximum pension any public employee could earn cannot exceed the average family income for Illinois currently about $75,000/yr.

Fourth, replace as many pension trustees as possible with accountants, actuaries and businessmen so we can have an honest, taxpayer friendly appraisal of investments and benefits.

Fifth, use Wisconsin's K-12 system as a model for pay and benefits reform in Illinois. See WI - IL comparison here.

Illinois taxpayers are ready for comprehensive pension reform. We'll have to defeat the Springfield establishment/Illinois Combine to get it. It will be worth it so we can have a future for our families.

Background Reading:

ChampionNews.net: Teacher Unions Say Pensions Are Too Low

2 comments:

  1. Hello:

    I have previously brought to the attention of the original author that this is an inaccurate statement:

    "One of the top legislative priorities of the Illinois Education Association is a plan they call "80, 30 and out." It would allow teachers to retire after 30 years with a pension equal to 80% of their salary. This is in contrast to the current plan of 35 years at 75% of salary."

    None of that is true. That is not, and never was, the IEA plan. If you leave this on your Website you will be misleading your readers.

    Thanks

    Charles McBarron - IEA Communications

    ReplyDelete
  2. C McB:

    Thank you for your comment. I did additional research and updated the post.

    However, I do have an issue with the IEA. This is what IEA President Ken Swanson stated in a video in a video message to your members posted on your site:

    “We have passed an income tax increase that will start to put Illinois back on a path to fiscal solvency and we passed bonds to pay for this year’s pension obligation.”

    History has shown that tax increases don't increase revenue, but tax cuts do. The size of our state government needs to decrease to put us on the right track. People are leaving this state. They are being welcomed by Indiana, Wisconsin, New Jersey, and even Texas.

    The current economic climate reveals that union contracts with high salary increses, pension payouts, and gold plated benifits packages is unsustainable. If the state goes bankrupt, those contracts may be voided out. I'll have to research the laws on that.

    ReplyDelete